A Brief Analysis of Muhammad’s Farewell Sermon

From WikiIslam

Please note: The quoted Sermon analyzed in this article is said to have been found in Musnad Ahmed bin Hanbal - Hadith no. 19774,^[1] and not the Sermon as found in al-Tabari, which can be read here.

[edit] Introduction

According to Muslim historians, Muhammad’s Farewell Sermon (خطبة الوداع‎, Khuṭbatu l-Wadā') was delivered on the ninth day of Dhu al-Hijjah (Month of Hajj- Pilgrimage 632 CE) in the valley of mount Arafat. This area located in Saudi Arabia was, and still is, considered holy and even today non-Muslims are forbidden from entering. The sermon took place ten years after Muhammad’s Hijra (هِجْرَة Migration) to Medina, meaning it was after winning Mecca and wiping the infidels from the land.

Before we begin our analysis of the Farewell Sermon, please note that as an event, it took place following this remarkable revelation:

Accordingly, the listeners were all strictly Muslim. Muhammad was addressing his own folks, since no others were allowed to enter the area of the Sacred Mosque, which includes the Plain of Arafat.

[edit] Analysis of The Farewell Sermon

Muhammad begins by praising and thanking his lord, then addresses his followers.

[edit] The Call for Jihad

"Take these words to those who could not be present here today," An extremely significant statement, as it is symbolically calling for a full-scale Jihad. He accentuates the importance of taking his words to those who are not present there; naturally, by whatever means he has employed thus far to take down all those who had not paid heed to him and his message. Put simply, it meant: “wage Jihad by any means”

There is nothing noteworthy here, except the first few sentences which reaffirm the sacredness of the city and the period, purified from unbelievers. Confirming once again, that the audience was exclusively Muslim.

Again, nothing unusual, as most preacher preaches against Satan.

[edit] Misogyny

All of a sudden, this 'enlightening' sermon sinks into misogyny. As the addressees were men, Muhammad reminds them of their rights over women, but (almost as an afterthought) adds that women too have rights over men. But these so-called rights of women are very much conditional. If women abide by the rights given to men, only then do they deserve to be fed and clothed. As far as women's rights are concerned in this sermon, that’s it. Men are also encouraged to be kind to their women so long as they stay quite and obedient, something akin to a pet (in another account of this sermon, Muhammad does indeed liken women to domestic animals^[2]). Women even have restrictions placed on their friendships with others (male or female) as proven by Muhammad commanding chastity from women separately. Therefore, even innocent friendships with other women is not possible if the husband wishes it. They are under their husbands will and can only enjoy what we would consider the basic rights of a women in a traditional marriage only if they remain in full compliance to their men. Great sermon!

A mention of the pillars of Islam; Nothing of note.

[edit] Equality of Mankind

This is the most often quoted portion of the Farewell Sermon, used by Muslims to preach of their prophet’s commitment to humanity. The talk is harsh on Arab prejudice against non-Arabs. It would seem, we have some glossy words against racism! In reality, Muhammad was talking of piety in religious affairs. In this faculty, there can be no supreme race or language. Muhammad was compelled to preach this, due to his earlier call for Jihad. His followers would no-doubt encounter many non-Arabs and people of differing races, so in tough times, these kinds of appeasements would be necessary.

[edit] Racial Prejudice

On the other hand, Muhammad was very much prejudicial. For an example of this, we need only look to the following hadith where he hoists clannish supremacy:

The Quraish (قريش‎ Qurayš) were Arabs and Muhammad (himself being from the Quraish tribe) was speaking of the rulers who would rise up after him to rule over the Islamic world. When Muhammad says "will be" the connotation to his followers was and still is "should be". Moreover, this hadith has contributed a lot to the Shia-Sunni rift in the Muslim world.

[edit] Brotherhood in Islam

Next we tackle the meaning of "brotherhood" in Islam; Whenever Muhammad talked of brotherhood, it was only of the brotherhood between fellow believers (Muslims) and here too it is no different. Muhammad starts by proclaiming "all mankind is from a common father and mother", but soon adds "Learn that every Muslim is a brother to every Muslim and that the Muslims constitute one brotherhood." It could not be stated any clearer than that; Only Muslims are brothers to Muslims. There is no mention of Atheists, Idolaters or even the so-called People of the Book who themselves are often equated with Idolaters. Muhammad began his speech with the call for Jihad, so this has much significance. It was a call to stretch beyond their current dominion and for this purpose he alerts only those whom he considers part of the brotherhood. When the going gets tough, Muslims (and only Muslims) should conserve the brotherhood. We now move onto the final part of the sermon.

[edit] The Termination of Prophethood

Muhammad reaffirms the termination of prophethood by saying "no new faith will be born." Once again, "will be born" When spoken by Muhammad means "should be born." This speech took place after winning over the unbelievers of Mecca. He had already expelled the entirety of the Jewish population from the land, and cleansed his holy city of all unbelievers. Islam had finally won over existing faiths, and likewise there should be no other faiths in the future. Muslims must keep an eye out for new emergent faiths like the Bahá'ís and do that which is necessary to destroy them. And this is what Muslims push as Muhammad being at his most tolerant!?

He continues by saying "I leave behind me two things, the Qur'an and my example, the sunnah, and if you follow these you will never go astray". As with the beginning, he concludes the sermon with the reiteration for Jihad. "All those who listen to me shall pass on my words to others and those to others again" And by doing so, they have to follow Qur'an and Sunnah of the prophet. This takes us back to the Qur'an.

[edit] The Meaning of Fitna

The Arabic word Fitna (فِتْنَةٌ‎) does not have the same meaning as given by our three official translators (Yusuf Ali, Picktall, Shakir), which is "tumult" and "oppression". To understand the true meaning of this word as spoken by Muhammad, we need to look towards the universally accepted Qur'anic commentary by Ibn Kathir:

[Please click here for further details]

It is plainly evident that the word "Fitna" denotes polytheism or anything un-Islamic.

[edit] Conclusion

Muhammad started his sermon, proclaiming the importance of conveying his message to those who were absent. Who are these absentees? In fact, there weren’t many Muslims absent. Ali had been called back from Yemen to partake in this pilgrimage. Moreover, Muhammad did not say anything new in this sermon to his Muslim followers. He preached on (Strictly Muslim) brotherhood, then of the pillars of Islam, All of which had been already established. Five prayers a day, fasting, Zakat (giving alms), performing hajj; Jizyah too was established by then. There was no need to repeat any of this information to the well-informed Muslims. Therefore, we can conclude that the absentees being referred to were in fact the non-Muslims of foreign lands. Muhammad was alerting his followers to convey the message of Islam to the absentees, who were yet to become Muslims. As has been mentioned previously, he signalled this in the introduction and conclusion of his speech. Convey this message to the absentees.

Muslim historians tell us what happened soon after this farewell sermon:

An expedition to Syria, which is far beyond Mecca! So jihad had begun straight after Muhammad’s farewell speech. Muhammad sent messengers to distant kings including; Negus, Chosroes of Persia, and the Eastern Roman Emperor Heraclius, to whom he wrote:

This account’s authenticity has been doubted by many critics. However, there seems to be no reason to disbelieve in the contents of the oration. Nevertheless, it is obvious that the sermon has been cut short while reporting. Additions may not have been made, but there were a lot of deletion for sure. The reason for believing this? These kinds of sermons are usually too lengthy, but this particular one of Muhammad's is rather short. That’s why believing many parts of this sermon have been erased is by no means irrational. A good deal of editing had most likely been done by Ahmed bin Hanbal. This cannot be denied.

[edit] References

[edit] See also

• The Farewell Sermon
• Historical Correspondence with Jihadists
• The Ultimate Message of the Qur'an
• Muhammad the Racist

[edit] External links

• A Phony Last Sermon of Muhammad and the Fraud of Progressive Islam