Quranic Grammar
From WikiIslam
Amongst both Muslims and non-Muslims, a diversity of opinions exists regarding the Quran. How does the Quran view non-Muslims, other religions, women, violence and peace? What is the worldview of the Quranic author(s)? How are criminal penalties carried out? With so many divergent opinions, it is important (at least for those who speak Arabic) to use grammar and carefully read the Quran to understand it.
Polls often show that many people are ignorant of basic facts in history, geography, politics, math, science, grammar and other subjects. Likewise, the vast majority of those interested or immersed in Islam are not experts in Quranic grammar. One would then expect that a Divine book would be written for all or most people, not just the scholarly community.
But questions even arise as to how well many Quranic-grammar scholars understand Quranic grammar. Languages tend to be chaotic and grammarians tend to invent imperfect rules to explain the way a language is used. It is unrealistic to expect and futile to prove that grammar is a perfect science. Even scholars can disagree. And as many editors know, not all writers adhere to grammatical rules.
Diacritical marks and vowels were a later addition to the Quran and there is no way to prove that these were applied correctly. As previously discussed, there are reasons to suspect that the Quran has been altered. If one is serious about understanding the Quran, it is very important to study Quranic grammar, but its utility is limited.
[1](Richard Kroes) writes:
Ali Dashti: “23 Years: A study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad”, page 48 writes:
As soon as one is skeptical of the diacritical marks and vowels and one is open to the possibility of foreign languages such as Syriac, Hebrew and Ethiopic being in the Quran, the text becomes that much more elusive to interpret.
[2] mentions:
[3] discusses the grammatical principle called Iltifat. Having to resort to such grammatical rules implies a corrupt text.
We have seen how did the Muslim scholars invent pre-Islamic poetry, Hadith, and even imaginary words claiming them to be from foreign languages. We now turn to the last invention that won them the gold medal: Early Muslims as they wrestled with the various errors in the Qur'an, have advanced different reasons as to why they should not be errors. The early attempts to explain away the grammatical errors in the Qur'an relied on the performance of acrobatic feats in the field of grammar. The fact that these attempts differed indicate that some scholars were not content with others answers, which is an indication of idterab (perplexion). Dissatisfied with the different attempts that relied on the manipulation of grammatical rules some scholars have invented a sweeping new rule to fix most errors They called it iltifat. ... Most of the authors who talk about iltifat use the examples from the Qur'an. No one seems to quote references in prose other than from the Qur'an: and indeed a sampling of hadith material found not a single instance.
The types of iltifatNewton and related features are of following types:
Changes in person, between 1st, 2nd and 3rd person, which is the most common and is usually divided into six kinds. The four important examples that are found in the Qur'an are: Transition from the 3rd to 1st person. This is the most common type. Over 140 instances can be found in the Qur'an. From 1st to 3rd person - nearly 100 such instances can be found in the Qur'an. From 3rd to 2nd person - nearly 60 instances. From 2nd to 3rd person - under 30 instances. Change in the number, between singular, dual and plural. Change in the addressee. Change in the tense of the verb. Change in the case marker.
Using noun in the place of pronoun.
The Quran is a book that impacts the entire society and not just its believers. It discusses the treatment of slaves, women, thieves, adulterers, non-believers, etc. So if the Quran is misinterpreted this will impact many people. A person might think that a person stole something and through an (mis)interpretation of the Quran amputates her hand.
People with ulterior motives, or who are not careful might impose their own values and biases onto a text. Therefore, to determine the true meaning of a text, one must adhere to the norms of grammar. Without this framework with regard to the Quran, one must rely on self-proclaimed Quranic experts, each claiming to have the truth while offering different opinions. Without a reliance on grammar, one can read almost anything into a text or manipulate the text to manipulate others. Since the Quran has such a major impact on society, society has a right to understand the grammatical principles underlying it, so the text is interpreted correctly.
When the Quran is interpreted by iltifat, one can read almost anything into it. Hence, even if it were a Divine text, it has at the very least, been manipulated by humans. The result makes the Quran sometimes seem vicious since -- at minimum – it is unclear about barbaric practices and this ambiguity leaves it open to human manipulation. Moreover, the Quranic author comes across as paranoid fighting against all sorts of people perceived as evil. Yet he would trust people to interpret this unclear book?
Many Muslims assume the Quran is a text from God, the current text is the same as the original, and that it is clear. Grammar is one way of testing this hypothesis. When one considers iltifat, it seems absurd to say that the text is clear and that it is a perfect text.
