From WikiIslam

[edit] Deleting talk content

Please dont delete Talk content from other users as you did here. I have restored the Talk pages.--Whale 14:04, 27 January 2007 (CST)

Whale my intent was ABSOLUTELY NOT TO CHANGE THE INTENT ..... I hope you alread checked that I wanted you to show with the older version, that at some stage of the "talk" a person manipulated the text by putting my "Archangel for L.G." into Sanitarium`s first comment.

--Archangel for L.G. 14:14, 27 January 2007 (CST)

...and this: WHY HAVE YOU NOT DELETED THE KORANIC BIBLE ARTICLE ? Did you never read my quotes that I gave to blast this liefilled article ?

--Archangel for L.G. 14:14, 27 January 2007 (CST)

AA, I have SAID before the article will NOT be deleted - did you not understand me the first time? Your english skills are lacking sorely as well. This is an english site. I told you to get a friend and work together. Why dont you back off this site for a while and come back with a clearer head as to what you should do. I have repeatedly tried to make you understand but you are not getting anywhere. Can you do graphical work? I can tell you what to do on this site so your contributions will be more constructive. Dont delete Talk content next time or I'll block you and I wont you let in again. Infact I should have blocked a long time ago when you evaded the block. Please be a little less annoying now.--Whale 14:55, 27 January 2007 (CST)

Whale .... slowly my impression is increasing that you also try to cover this bullshit article which is so filled with lies that anyone straight would vomit on such ...... is this straight forward ENGLISH enough for you. Whale I am getting on the end with you since you dare to protect this shit article even at the stage when I made it cristal clear that the author lied.

The Koranic Bible Article is not a Fact by Fact Article it is a tricky intellectually blown up tale filled with nonsens with the intention to bring people to the sight, that the Creator of the Universe was Jesus, that later Jesus became Mohamed and that ....and thus the conclusion on this is the final try to manipulate people by thus suggesting indirectly as a logical move that Mohamed is similar to the Creator of the Universe ... so that Mohamed is not only the Prophet but also Allah ......

Thus this story teller played his game also on the Mohamedinian Lies ....... and also with the truely care taking messages, which can be found in the old book.

Previously I thought that I can see in you somehow a really Human being but you teased me so much that my patience declines....

What is my minimum limit I tell you now is to WARN PEOPLE PRIOR TO THE KB ARTICLE THAT THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS A LOT OF LIES WITH THE AIM TO WEAKEN CHRISTIAN BELIEVERS IN THEIR WELL FUNDAMENTED SIGHTS OF TRUTHFILLED ORIGIN.

WHALE I gave quotes to my commentary .... and even with my English I could make it clear that Apple Pie lied ..... with nice and beautiful words, with long sentences in which he turned to its contrary at the end what he wrote at the beginning ... IT IS ABSURD that this ARTICLE could be for such a long time on Wikiislam .... an article which shows up solely two main positions: Its stunning how small is the level of knowledge about the religion (re-ligere Latin for "finding contact again" or so..) and how small is the knowledge about the dark sides book - the Koran.

This must also be related to your two knowledges ... Whale. .....because if this would not been true you would have blasted the KB article weeks ago.

....why not.... let me know your secret... maybe you think, that Muslims who read this KB Article would get interest to learn more about "Mohameds Previos Existence as Jesus" ....... and thus would turn possibly soon away from the Mohamed prefering the Jesus "Existence" of this Soul......

....or is their any other surpressed idea in your mental backyard which might have this shine of "good moving"....

No Whale, I tell you, its really better in this case to stay to truth as close as possible and not breaking away into liefilled lanes as Apple Pies phantasies showed.

The Meaning of Archangel for L.G. is: Archangel for LOVING GOD ...... "games" I do play are good ones, because my intentions are !

Think a moment about Apple Pie`s aims ......

.....as he tries to make the Koran a GOOD LOOKING BOOK this does not fit to the orignal makers biography since in his final ten years Mohamed was a raper, a murderer and a thief and also a robber....

So what can be Apple Pie`s intent ..... there was a second undercover Mohamed .... a man who truely was loving God ..... and the bad Mohamed robbed the good Mohameds leaflets and then ´dictated the Medinian Suras to "complete" the Koran the way we now it nowadays .... so that the whole story we got from historians is wrong ...

What I can tell you on such speculation is that: If you really read the Mekkan Suras as a Man aware of his testacles you would feel the strange and absurde sweetness of the wording you find there... .....its this oversweetiness which truthloving persons detect as nacistical "love" ..... such men primarily almost at any stage "love" first themselves ......

...that`s also the reason why so many arabs murder and plunder so many arabs .....

They do not really love ....... in another way of "not really loving" I got this impression also from you Whale.

Your critics aim on my weak English, on my low interest of the editing notices .... and on other surface aspects .... but where the aims should go deeper and touch the will for truthfilled moving you do not respond on my suggestions, you even hinder the truth to prosper.

Go ahead and make clear to me what are your intentions to let this KB article without any warning......

--Archangel for L.G. 14:39, 29 January 2007 (CST)

AA, why did you create that new article that was full of personal attacks on ApplePie? Inspite of me and Sanitarium spending a month trying to make you understand what to do and how to do it, you just returned to your old stuff - personal attacks. I'm sorry I'll have to block you this time. There's no time on this site for stuff like this. Please do not return again. I will give up trying to make you understand how to contribute here. I showed you examples and told how to do stuff here - which is not really hard to do. There are so many other contributors here and everyone else who can make their own judgements as to what the best thing to do is. Have a nice day and please, do not recreate your account this time. If you want criticism done on the KB articles, please talk to a friend who can do the job for you. --Whale 15:15, 29 January 2007 (CST)